California Labor &
Employment Law Blog

May. 27 2008

California Legislature Takes Steps to Protect Medical Marijuana Users’ Employment

Topics: New Laws & Legislation

Earlier this year, the California Supreme Court delivered its decision in Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc., holding that an employer could properly terminate an employee who failed a drug test due to use of medically prescribed marijuana. The Court reasoned that California's Compassionate Use Act, which protects medical marijuana users from criminal prosecution, does not contain any provision protecting employment or limiting employers' ability to terminate applicants or employees who test positive for marijuana. In response to this decision, Assemblyman Mark Leno authored legislation (AB 2279) aimed at overturning the Ross v. RagingWire decision and protecting the employment of medical marijuana users in California. AB 2279 was introduced in February and was approved by the Assembly Judiciary Committee and the Assembly Labor and Employment Committee, prior to moving to the Assembly floor for a vote this past week. The final vote was 38-34 in favor of passage. However, the bill needs 41 votes (a majority of the Assembly) in order to pass. As a result, the bill is expected to be voted on by the Assembly again in the coming days.

California employers who utilize drug testing for applicants and/or current employees should monitor the progress of AB 2279, and may want to promptly voice their opposition to, or support for, AB 2279 to their local Assembly member.

 

About CDF

For over 20 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent has a regular presence in California state and federal courts and has been lead defense counsel and appellate counsel for large and small California employers in litigation (and arbitration) ranging from individual discrimination and harassment claims to complex wage and hour representative and class actions. She also leads the firm’s appellate practice, having substantial experience and success handling appeals, writ petitions, and amicus briefs in both state and federal court on issues such as class certification (particularly in the wage and hour arena), manageability and due process concerns associated with class action trials, exempt/non-exempt misclassification issues, meal and rest break compliance, trade secret/unfair competition matters, and the scope of federal court jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991


Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2018

About CDFWhat We DoContact UsAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer