California Labor &
Employment Law Blog

Oct. 22 2015

USCIS Publishes F-1 STEM Regulation and Expands Employment Authorization to 24 Months

Topics: Immigration

On August 12, 2015 the US District Court for the District of Columbia struck down USCIS’ regulation permitting F-1 students holding Science Technology Engineering and Math (“STEM”) degrees to receive an additional seventeen months of practical training employment authorization.  The Court held that USCIS violated the Administrative Procedures Act by failing to make the rule available for public comment before implementation.  Click here to read the decision from the court and here to read our prior blog post on this case.  The court stayed its ruling for six months to permit USCIS to cure its failure to conduct notice and comment rulemaking. 

Earlier this week, the US Citizenship and Immigration Service published its F-1 STEM employment authorization regulation for comment.  Click here to read the proposed regulation.  In the newly published regulation, USCIS proposes to enlarge the post-graduate employment authorization for F-1 STEM graduates from seventeen to twenty-four months.  Combined with the twelve months of optional practical training employment authorization available to any F-1 students, STEM graduates of US universities will be permitted to remain in and work in the United States for three years.  USCIS will accept comments from the general public for until November 18, 2015, and then publish the final rule.

About CDF

For over 20 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent has a regular presence in California state and federal courts and has been lead defense counsel and appellate counsel for large and small California employers in litigation (and arbitration) ranging from individual discrimination and harassment claims to complex wage and hour representative and class actions. She also leads the firm’s appellate practice, having substantial experience and success handling appeals, writ petitions, and amicus briefs in both state and federal court on issues such as class certification (particularly in the wage and hour arena), manageability and due process concerns associated with class action trials, exempt/non-exempt misclassification issues, meal and rest break compliance, trade secret/unfair competition matters, and the scope of federal court jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991


Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2018

About CDFWhat We DoContact UsAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer