California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
Supreme Court Rules That Title VII Protects LGBTQ From Employment Discrimination
Jun 15, 2020

Supreme Court Rules That Title VII Protects LGBTQ From Employment Discrimination

Topics: Court Decisions

This morning, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion (authored by Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch) holding that Title VII’s protections against sex discrimination in the workplace apply to LGBTQ employees.  This resolves a split of authority among lower courts and now confirms that under federal law, Title VII prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.  This has long been the law in California, so this should not be a game-changer for California employers in terms of their anti-discrimination policies and practices.  Any multi-state employers who do not already have policies in place prohibiting discrimination and harassment on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity will want to revise their policies to be in compliance with today’s ruling. 

Today’s Supreme Court decision was issued in three different cases that were consolidated for purposes of review.  In the first case, Bostock v. Clayton County, the plaintiff, a long-term employee, was fired by his County employer for conduct “unbecoming” of a County employee after he joined a recreational gay softball league and certain influential members of the community expressed criticism of him.  In the second case,  Zarda v. Altitude Express, the plaintiff worked several seasons for the employer as a skydiving instructor until he was fired shortly after disclosing that he was gay.  In the third case, Stephens v. R.G. & G.R. Funeral Homes, the plaintiff worked for the employer for six years as a male but then disclosed to the employer that he intended to transition and to live and work as a female.  The employee was fired shortly thereafter.

In Bostock, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that Title VII does not bar sexual orientation discrimination and, thus, dismissed the employee’s claim.  The Second Circuit in Zarda and the Sixth Circuit in Stephens disagreed, allowing the discrimination claims of those employees to proceed under Title VII.  These split rulings on the same issue set the stage for Supreme Court review and today’s ruling resolving that split and pronouncing that Title VII indeed prohibits discrimination against an employee on the basis of sexual orientation and transgender status.  The complete ruling is available here.

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent has a regular presence in California state and federal courts and has been lead defense counsel and appellate counsel for large and small California employers in litigation (and arbitration) ranging from individual discrimination and harassment claims to complex wage and hour representative and class actions. She also leads the firm’s appellate practice, having substantial experience and success handling appeals, writ petitions, and amicus briefs in both state and federal court on issues such as class certification (particularly in the wage and hour arena), manageability and due process concerns associated with class action trials, exempt/non-exempt misclassification issues, meal and rest break compliance, trade secret/unfair competition matters, and the scope of federal court jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991

Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2020

About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy