California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
Security Checks Gain Renewed Attention
Sep 8, 2022

Security Checks Gain Renewed Attention

Topics: Court Decisions, Personnel Policies and Procedures, Wage & Hour Issues

The California Supreme Court will soon decide if employees must be compensated for time spent waiting in their cars to pass through an employer’s security check. Specifically, the California Supreme Court will decide:

  1. whether time spent in a personal vehicle waiting to scan an identification badge, have security guards look into their vehicle, and then exit a security gate is considered hours worked; 
  2. whether time spent driving between a security gate and an employee parking lot is considered hours worked; and, 
  3. whether collectively bargained-for meal-time, when workers cannot leave the premises but are not required to engage in employer-mandated activities, count as payable work hours.

In this case, Huerta v. CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc., the named plaintiff, Huerta, claims that his employer required him and other putative class members to arrive at a security gate entrance controlled by his employer, wait in vehicle lines for the employer’s biologists to approve the road for travel, then wait in the vehicle to have their badges swiped by people employed or controlled by the employer. Huerta further alleges that once they cleared security, employees then drove to the parking lots, but during the drive, they were subject to a broad range of job site rules and restrictions for which employees could be suspended or terminated if they did not comply.   

The key question here is whether this security process rises to a sufficient level of employer control such that the time constitutes hours worked, triggering compensation. Unsurprisingly, Huerta argues that because he and the other employees were subject to the employer’s control this entire time, they should be compensated for the time spent undergoing these procedures. From the employer’s perspective, however, this time is not compensable because employees are not required to exit their cars— they simply hold up their badges for scanning (analogous to scanning a badge to enter a facility), and the drive time is essentially a continuation of their commute, as employees can take their own cars or carpool (as opposed to riding in employer-mandated transportation, which is compensable under Morillion v. Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal.4th 575 (2000)). Further, the driving rules are akin to general workplace requirements and are not burdensome, but rather reflect the nature of the property. 

While it will be interesting how the California Supreme Court ultimately rules, one thing is clear: this is just another example of how increasingly common lawsuits for time spent undergoing security checks have become. There is no shortage of enterprise plaintiff’s counsel ready to capitalize on ways to challenge employer’s policies by expanding or creating new precedent. California employers would be wise to evaluate their wage and hour policies to avoid being the next target.

Contact your favorite CDF attorney if you need assistance evaluating your policies and procedures.  

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor in Chief

Sacramento Office Managing Partner and Chair of CDF’s Traditional Labor Law Practice Group. Mark has been practicing labor and employment law in California for thirty years. His practice has a special emphasis on the representation of California employers in union-management relations and handling federal and state court litigation and administrative matters triggered by all types of employment-related disputes. He is also adept at providing creative and practical legal advice to help minimize the risks inherent in employing workers in California. He recently named “Sacramento Lawyer of the Year” in Employment Law-Management for 2021 by Best Lawyers®.
> Full Bio   > Email   Call 916.361.0991

CDF Labor Law LLP © 2022

Editorial Board About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy