California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
Not All Fun and Games? College Athletes May Soon Drive a Hard Bargain With Union Support
Jun 7, 2021

Not All Fun and Games? College Athletes May Soon Drive a Hard Bargain With Union Support

Topics: Union-Management Relations

On May 27, 2021, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) introduced the College Athlete Right to Organize Act seeking to provide collective bargaining rights for college athletes.  Specifically, the bill seeks to amend the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to define any college athlete as an employee, if they receive any direct compensation (inclusive of scholarships and other forms of financial aid).

Prior efforts by college athletes to unionize have not been successful.  Notably, in August 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) blocked an attempt by Northwestern University football players to create their own union.  Other efforts have been advanced by legislators in the last few years, always arguing that the multibillion-dollar business model of big-time college sports favors the institutions while seemingly taking advantage of college athletes.  Because of the revenue being generated by big-time college athletics, as well as the significant salaries being paid to many coaches, the pressure to better financially reward revenue-sport athletes for their time and effort remains strong.  This pressure, combined with the Biden Administration’s strong support for unions helps promote the movement to create ways in which college athletes are treated more like employees, including by providing them with the right to organize and bargain with the universities and the NCAA.

The new bill seeks to change the dynamic of big-time college sports, by ensuring that those college athletes who already receive money through a scholarship or other financial aid gain the ability to bargain for changes in compensation, hours, healthcare benefits, pension plans, for autonomy when it comes to academic decisions, etcetera.  In response to the bill, a spokeswoman for the NCAA provided a statement that reaffirmed the association's stance that college athletes are students, not employees, and that the proposed legislation would "undercut the purpose of college: earning a degree."  College athletics are very popular in our country and many people have strong feelings about how college athletes should be treated.

It remains to be seen whether or not this bill will make it out of the current Congress.  Either way, academic institutions, and the NCAA, can expect more and more of these efforts to garner steam in the next few years, both at the legislative and administration level.  With a soon to be Democratic-majority NLRB, should such a bill pass, the implications could be far reaching.

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor in Chief

Sacramento Office Managing Partner and Chair of CDF’s Traditional Labor Law Practice Group. Mark has been practicing labor and employment law in California for thirty years. His practice has a special emphasis on the representation of California employers in union-management relations and handling federal and state court litigation and administrative matters triggered by all types of employment-related disputes. He is also adept at providing creative and practical legal advice to help minimize the risks inherent in employing workers in California. He recently named “Sacramento Lawyer of the Year” in Employment Law-Management for 2021 by Best Lawyers®.
> Full Bio   > Email   Call 916.361.0991

CDF Labor Law LLP © 2021

Editorial Board About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy