California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
May 8, 2011

Ninth Circuit Court Ruling on Employer’s Grooming Standards

Topics: New Laws & Legislation

Topic: grooming standards based on gender.
The Ninth Circuit, in an en banc decision, affirmed a prior decision that found appearance standards, including makeup requirements, do not impose an unequal burden on women, and do not amount to sexual stereotyping or harassment under Title VII. Employers should, however, ensure that their grooming standards are reasonable. If different grooming standards apply to men versus women, the employer must demonstrate a legitimate business reason for doing so. Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co., --F.3d --, 2006 WL 962538 (April 14, 2006).

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent has a regular presence in California state and federal courts and has been lead defense counsel and appellate counsel for large and small California employers in litigation (and arbitration) ranging from individual discrimination and harassment claims to complex wage and hour representative and class actions. She also leads the firm’s appellate practice, having substantial experience and success handling appeals, writ petitions, and amicus briefs in both state and federal court on issues such as class certification (particularly in the wage and hour arena), manageability and due process concerns associated with class action trials, exempt/non-exempt misclassification issues, meal and rest break compliance, trade secret/unfair competition matters, and the scope of federal court jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991

CDF Labor Law LLP © 2020

About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy