Feb. 1 2011

Meal Break Case Ordered Depublished

Topics: Court Decisions, Wage & Hour Issues

On October 30, 2010, we posted on the newly published case, Hernandez v. Chipotle, holding that employers need not ensure employees take meal breaks so long as they are provided an opportunity to take the breaks. The California Supreme Court has now granted review of the Chipotle case and ordered it depublished, pending the Court's long-awaited decision in Brinker v. Hohnbaum. In Brinker, the California Supreme Court is expected to decide whether California law requires employers to ensure non-exempt employees take a full 30 minute lunch break and are liable even if employees voluntarily choose to skip such breaks, or whether employers are simply required to provide employees the opportunity to take such breaks. Although the Brinker case has been fully briefed and before the Court for months, it is not yet set for oral argument. As such, a decision is not expected until at least Summer 2011. We will continue to post developments on this important topic.

About CDF

For over 20 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent represents employers, including major food and retail companies, in all types of employment litigation: wrongful termination, retaliation, breach of contract, wage and hour (California Labor Code) and unfair competition. She also regularly counsels and advises California employers on issues of compliance with California and federal employment laws.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991

Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2018

About CDFWhat We DoContact UsAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer