California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
Five Bars of Wi-Fi Are Grounds For Disability Claims
Apr 26, 2021

Five Bars of Wi-Fi Are Grounds For Disability Claims

Topics: Court Decisions, Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation

The California Court of Appeal, Brown v. Los Angeles Unified School District, recently ruled that that electromagnetic sensitivity (aka “being sick to Wi-Fi”) constituted a “physical disability” under Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).  Brown was an LAUSD teacher who claimed chronic pain and other symptoms caused by her school’s new Wi-Fi system.  The trial court sustained LAUSD’s demurrer to Brown’s complaint that alleged discrimination based on physical disability, failure to accommodate, failure to engage in the interactive process, retaliation and failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation.  

The Court of Appeal upheld disposing of four of the five claims based on the demurrer that Brown failed to allege sufficient facts to support her claims.  However, the Court of Appeal held that Brown sufficiently alleged a physical disability under FEHA, even though other courts have held that Wi-Fi sickness is not a recognized disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and that, as a matter of pleading, Brown sufficiently alleged her claim for failure to accommodate.

California employers must remember that FEHA provides more worker protection than the ADA.  Although being sick from Wi-Fi is not a recognized disability under the ADA, it may nonetheless be a physical disability pursuant to FEHA when its alleged symptoms affect one or more body systems and limit the plaintiff’s ability to work.

The good news for employers is that the Court of Appeal dispensed with four disability discrimination and retaliation claims at the demurrer stage so that discovery and subsequent motion practice should be more narrowly focused which should also discourage future “kitchen sink” allegations.

Employers are undoubtedly left scratching their heads, wondering whether a reasonable accommodation is possible when an employee claims Wi-Fi makes them sick.  Few businesses can function without Wi-Fi, especially with remote workers, emphasizing the importance of the interactive process and accommodations. Thus, if confronted with claims of new types of disability, California employers should consult with counsel about addressing the interactive process and potential accommodations.

The ruling is a good reminder that technology constantly adds new complications to the workplace.  Employers need to be even more vigilant when receiving workplace accommodation requests and sweeping seemingly ridiculous claims under the rug can land you in court.

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor in Chief

Sacramento Office Managing Partner and Chair of CDF’s Traditional Labor Law Practice Group. Mark has been practicing labor and employment law in California for thirty years. His practice has a special emphasis on the representation of California employers in union-management relations and handling federal and state court litigation and administrative matters triggered by all types of employment-related disputes. He is also adept at providing creative and practical legal advice to help minimize the risks inherent in employing workers in California. He recently named “Sacramento Lawyer of the Year” in Employment Law-Management for 2021 by Best Lawyers®.
> Full Bio   > Email   Call 916.361.0991

CDF Labor Law LLP © 2021

Editorial Board About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy