California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
Final Results of CA Legislative Session:  Employment Bills Signed Into Law by Newsom
Oct 1, 2020

Final Results of CA Legislative Session:  Employment Bills Signed Into Law by Newsom

Topics: Legal Information, New Laws & Legislation

Yesterday was the last day for Governor Newsom to sign or veto bills that were passed by the Legislature this session.  Newsom signed several bills into law that will affect California employers in the coming year.  All new laws take effect January 1, 2021 unless otherwise indicated below.  Here’s the list:

AB 979 (Diversity of Board Membership):  In 2018, California passed a new law requiring publicly traded corporations with principal executive offices in California to have at least one female on their board of directors by the end of 2019, and increasing the female representation on the board to two or three by the end of 2021 (depending on size of the board).  AB 979 expands on the diversification requirements by now requiring these corporations to have at least one board member from an underrepresented community by the end of 2021. That minority representation must increase to two members by the end of 2022 for boards with between five to eight members, and three members for boards with more nine or more members.

SB 1384 (Wage Claims/Arbitration): This bill amends Labor Code 98.4 to allow the Labor Commissioner to provide representation to a claimant in connection with opposing an employer’s petition to compel arbitration of the claim, and/or in any arbitration hearing ordered for resolution of the claim.  Labor Commissioner representation applies where the claimant requests it and is financially unable to afford representation, and the Labor Commissioner determines the claim has merit based on an initial investigation.

AB 1512 (On-Call Rest Breaks/Security Industry):  This bill is industry-specific and is limited to the security services industry.  It is a much needed bill that amends California rest break law to allow unionized security guards to remain on-call during their rest breaks.  This new law abrogates the California Supreme Court’s horrible 2016 ruling in Augustus v. ABM Security Services (prohibiting on-call rest breaks) for covered employees.  This new rest break law takes effect immediately as urgency legislation.

SB 973 (Pay Data Reporting):  This bill is one that the Legislature has been trying to pass for a couple of years, but has not succeeded in doing so – until now.  Newsom signed this bill into law.  This bill requires private employers with 100 or more employees to submit a pay data report to California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) by March 31, 2021, and annually thereafter.  The report essentially must include information on the numbers of employees, by race, ethnicity and gender, who are employed in specified job categories.  The report also must provide pay band data for these workers.  The purpose of the report is to assist the DFEH in identifying discriminatory pay practices.

AB 1281 (CCPA):  This bill extends the employer exemption from certain provisions of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) to January 1, 2022.  Employers are reminded that they ARE covered by the notice provision of the CCPA, requiring them to provide notice to applicants/employees of personal information collected and the purposes for which it is used.

AB 2992 (Expanded Protections/Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault):  Existing law (Labor Code 230-230.1) provides employment protections and certain rights to time off of work for employees who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and/or stalking.  AB 2992 expands these laws to cover employees who are victims of “crime” or “abuse.”

AB 3075 (Corporate Statement of Information):  Existing law requires business entities to file a Statement of Information containing specified information with the Secretary of State.  AB 3075 imposes a new requirement that the statement of information indicate whether any officer or director has an outstanding final judgment issued by the DLSE or a court (from which no appeal is pending) for violation of a wage order or the Labor Code.  The new requirement starts January 1, 2022 or when the Secretary of State certifies that it has implemented California Business Connect, whichever is earlier.  AB 3075 also provides that a successor to any judgment debtor is liable for any wages, damages, and penalties owed to the predecessor’s former workforce pursuant to that judgment.

AB 1947 (Extension of Time to File Labor Commissioner Complaints):  This bill amends Labor Code section 98.7 to enlarge the time for employees to file complaints with the Labor Commissioner for claims that they were discriminated against or discharged in violation of Labor Code provisions enforced by the Labor Commissioner. The employee now has one year, instead of six months, to file a claim with the Labor Commissioner.  This bill also amends Labor Code section 1102.5 to allow an employee who prevails on a claim for certain types of retaliation to recover his or her attorneys’ fees.

AB 2017 (Kin Care Leave):  Existing law, Labor Code 233, provides that employees must be permitted to use at least half of their annual accrual of employer-provided sick leave for “kin care” (family) reasons.  This bill amends the law to provide that it is up to the employee’s “sole discretion” to designate leave to use for this purpose.

SB 275 (Healthcare Employers/PPE):  This bill requires specified healthcare employers, beginning January 1, 2023, to maintain an inventory of new and unexpired PPE sufficient to cover 45 days of surge consumption in the event of a declared state of emergency.

AB 2537 (Acute Care Hospitals/PPE):  This bill requires public and private employers of general acute care hospital workers to supply those employees who provide direct patient care or provide services that directly support personal care with the personal protective equipment necessary to comply with specified regulations.  The bill would also require an employer to ensure that the employees use the personal protective equipment supplied to them. The bill would further require that an employer in this context, beginning April 1, 2021, maintain a supply of specified equipment in an amount equal to 3 months of normal consumption. 

AB 685 (COVID Reporting):  This new law, effective January 1, 2021, requires employers who receive notice of potential exposure to their workforce of COVID-19 to provide specified disclosures to employees within one business day.  My prior summary of this new law is here.

SB 1159 (COVID Workers’ Comp Coverage):  This new law, which is effective immediately as urgency legislation, extends the presumption of workers’ compensation coverage for COVID illnesses contracted by certain employees who work outside the home.  This new law also provides new COVID reporting obligations for employers.  Our prior summary of this new law is here.

SB 1383 (Expansion of CFRA Leave):  This new law expands California’s Family Rights Act to require employers with as few as five employees to provide up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to employees for covered reasons, including serious health conditions of the employee or a family member and/or for baby bonding.  The bill also expands the qualifying reasons for leave to include qualifying exigencies related to a family member being called to active duty.  Finally, the bill eliminates prior rights of employers to limit leave to 12 weeks of combined baby-bonding leave when both parents are employees, and further eliminates prior rights of employers to limit reinstatement for certain key employees.  My prior summary of this new law is here.

AB 1867 (Supplemental COVID Sick Leave):  This new law, which is effective immediately as urgency legislation, requires private employers with more than 500 employees, to provide up to 80 hours of supplemental paid sick leave to employees to use for specified COVID purposes.  The specific requirements of this new law are summarized in my prior post here.

AB 2143 (No Rehire Provisions/Settlement Agreements):  Last year, California enacted a new law (Code of Civil Procedure 1002.5) prohibiting the inclusion of a no rehire provision in settlement agreements of employment disputes. AB 2143 makes some modest changes to this law, including creating an exception for employees found to have engaged in criminal conduct.  A detailed summary of the changes is set forth in my prior post here.

AB 2257 (More Dynamex Exemptions):  This bill expands the categories of exemptions from the “Dynamex” independent contractor classification test.  My prior summary of this new law is here.

The full text of each of the bills listed above is available by typing in the bill number on the California legislative site here.  

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor in Chief

Sacramento Office Managing Partner and Chair of CDF’s Traditional Labor Law Practice Group. Mark has been practicing labor and employment law in California for thirty years. His practice has a special emphasis on the representation of California employers in union-management relations and handling federal and state court litigation and administrative matters triggered by all types of employment-related disputes. He is also adept at providing creative and practical legal advice to help minimize the risks inherent in employing workers in California. He recently named “Sacramento Lawyer of the Year” in Employment Law-Management for 2021 by Best Lawyers®.
> Full Bio   > Email   Call 916.361.0991

CDF Labor Law LLP © 2021

Editorial Board About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy