California Labor &
Employment Law Blog

Federal DOL Proposes Salary Increase for White Collar Overtime Exemptions to $35,308
Mar. 7 2019

Federal DOL Proposes Salary Increase for White Collar Overtime Exemptions to $35,308

Topics: New Laws & Legislation, Wage & Hour Issues

Today, the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) announced a proposed rule that would increase the minimum salary required to qualify as exempt from overtime under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s white collar exemptions (executive, administrative, and professional employees).  The proposed increase would raise the minimum annual salary for exempt status from $23,360 to $35,308 (an increase in the weekly rate from $455 to $679).  This is a much smaller increase than the increase that had been adopted by the Obama administration DOL in 2016.  That increase would have raised the minimum salary for exempt status to $47,476 per year, but a court blocked that increase from taking effect. 

In addition to increasing the minimum salary to qualify for exempt status under the white collar exemptions, the proposed rule also would substantially increase the minimum annual compensation to qualify for the FLSA’s “highly compensated employee” exemption, from $100,000 to $147,414 (of which, at least $679 per week must be paid on a guaranteed salary or fee basis). 

The rule sets some special minimum compensation rates for employees in the motion picture industry and employees in Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa.

In addition to raising the minimum salary to qualify for exempt status under federal law, the proposed rule is also significant in that it would allow non-discretionary bonuses and incentive compensation to be used to satisfy up to 10% of the salary level.  Additionally, employers would have one catch-up period at the end of a 52-week period to make up any shortfall in the employee’s salary to bring it up to the required minimum.  In other words, the employer could pay the employee a guaranteed minimum salary of $611.10 per week (90 percent of the new minimum weekly salary), with the thinking that the employee’s non-discretionary bonuses and incentive compensation would bring the employee’s total annual salary to at least $35,308.  If the bonus and incentive compensation fell short of meeting the minimum salary, the employer would have one chance to make up the difference.

Today’s proposed rule does not include any changes to the “duties tests” to qualify for exempt status, nor does it provide for additional automatic periodic increases to the minimum salary level.  However, the proposed rule calls for the DOL to “review” the salary level every 4 years to consider whether an adjustment is needed.  

The public will have 60 days to submit comments on the proposed rule, which ultimately is expected to take effect January 1, 2020.

California employers are reminded that they have to comply not only with the FLSA’s minimum salary for exempt status, but also with California law, which has a higher minimum salary requirement for white collar exempt status ($49,920 for employers with 26 or more employees).  Additionally, California does not have a highly compensated employee exemption. Finally, California does not have any provision allowing bonuses and incentive compensation to be counted in determining whether an employee’s salary meets the minimum salary threshold for exempt status.  Thus, the newly proposed DOL rule primarily will impact employers with multi-state operations and employees in states other than California.

About CDF

For over 20 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent has a regular presence in California state and federal courts and has been lead defense counsel and appellate counsel for large and small California employers in litigation (and arbitration) ranging from individual discrimination and harassment claims to complex wage and hour representative and class actions. She also leads the firm’s appellate practice, having substantial experience and success handling appeals, writ petitions, and amicus briefs in both state and federal court on issues such as class certification (particularly in the wage and hour arena), manageability and due process concerns associated with class action trials, exempt/non-exempt misclassification issues, meal and rest break compliance, trade secret/unfair competition matters, and the scope of federal court jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991


Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2019

About CDFWhat We DoContact UsAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer