California Labor &
Employment Law Blog

Jan. 5 2010

California Labor Commissioner Issues Opinion on Faltering Company Exception to WARN Act

Topics: Legal Information

California’s Department of Labor Standards Enforcement issued a new opinion letter this week analyzing the requirements of the faltering business exception under the WARNAct. As most employers know, in certain circumstances employers are required to give employees 60 days notice of a mass layoff or shutdown. There is a notable exception to the 60-day notice requirement, known as the faltering company exception. In California, the faltering company exception is codified at Labor Code section 1402.5. Companies may apply to the DLSE for a determination that the company meets the faltering company exception and thereby are excused from the requirement of giving their employees 60 days advance notice of a layoff. The DLSE’s new opinion letter is fairly detailed and provides useful guidance on factors the DLSE will look at to determine whether the exception actually applies. Employers who believe they may qualify should review the new opinion letter for guidance. The letter (which concludes that the exception does not apply on the facts presented) is available here. Interestingly, the DLSE has also re-posted an older opinion letter wherein the DLSE found the faltering business exception applicable. That letter is available here.

About CDF

For over 20 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent has a regular presence in California state and federal courts and has been lead defense counsel and appellate counsel for large and small California employers in litigation (and arbitration) ranging from individual discrimination and harassment claims to complex wage and hour representative and class actions. She also leads the firm’s appellate practice, having substantial experience and success handling appeals, writ petitions, and amicus briefs in both state and federal court on issues such as class certification (particularly in the wage and hour arena), manageability and due process concerns associated with class action trials, exempt/non-exempt misclassification issues, meal and rest break compliance, trade secret/unfair competition matters, and the scope of federal court jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991


Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2018

About CDFWhat We DoContact UsAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer