Oct. 30 2010

California Court Says Employer Does Not Have to Ensure Breaks Are Taken

Topics: Class Actions, Court Decisions, Wage & Hour Issues

While California employers continue to await the California Supreme Court's decision in Brinker, one Court of Appeal has issued a published decision holdingthat an employer does not have to ensure its employees take their meal breaks so long as they are provided the opportunity to take them. The court also denied class certification to a putative class of employees alleging meal break violations. The decision is Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, and is here.

Meanwhile, the Brinker case has not yet been set for oral argument before the Supreme Court, which means that a decision is not expected until at least Spring 2011. That decision is expected to resolve the question of whether California law requires employers to "ensure" meal breaks are taken, or simply provide the opportunity to take them (with no liability if an employee chooses to skip the break or take a short break). We will continue topostdevelopments on this important topic.

About CDF

For over 20 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor

Robin Largent represents employers, including major food and retail companies, in all types of employment litigation: wrongful termination, retaliation, breach of contract, wage and hour (California Labor Code) and unfair competition. She also regularly counsels and advises California employers on issues of compliance with California and federal employment laws.
> Contact   > Full Bio   Call 916.361.0991

Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2018

About CDFWhat We DoContact UsAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer