California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
Bipartisan Legislation Limiting Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment or Assault Claims Requires Employers to Re-Examine Employment Arbitration Agreements
Feb 16, 2022

Bipartisan Legislation Limiting Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment or Assault Claims Requires Employers to Re-Examine Employment Arbitration Agreements

Topics: Arbitration Agreements, Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation

Over the course of three days, the House and Senate passed HR 4445, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, amending the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) that is expected to be signed into law by President Biden in short order.

HR 4445 intends to prohibit mandatory arbitration of employee claims of sexual harassment or sexual assault. The new law will not void or render existing arbitration agreements unenforceable but will allow employees alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault to opt out of existing arbitration agreements.  In addition, the enrolled bill appears to permit plaintiffs the ability to opt-out of any pre-dispute waiver of class action or representative status provisions that employers have used to eliminate potential class action sexual harassment or sexual assault claims.

HR 4445, on its face, will apply narrowly to claims asserting a sexual assault under 18 USC 2246 and, more broadly, to conduct that is alleged to constitute sexual harassment under Federal, Tribal or State laws.

Finally, HR 4445 ensures that any disputes about the enforceability of an arbitration agreement are to be decided in court, not by an arbitrator, even where the arbitration agreement provides for arbitrability issues to be decided by an arbitrator.

The statute does not have a retroactivity provision and should only apply to disputes that arise after the law is effective.  As the courts interpret this new law, we will learn whether claims other than sexual assault or harassment, which are alleged in the same action, are required to be arbitrated separately, while HR 4445 claims are resolved in the courts.

Currently the Federal courts are working through some similar issues including whether California’s AB 51, which attempted to ban most employment arbitration, is preempted or barred by Federal law.  AB 51 is currently enjoined.  Similarly, on March 30, 2022, the United States Supreme Court will hear Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, Case No. 20-1573, to decide whether the FAA preempts California court decisions that currently allow employees to bring California Private Attorney General Act representative claims to circumvent their arbitration agreements that waived class or representative participation. HR 4445 adds another issue to the employment arbitration pie that the Courts will be addressing.

The new law provides an opportune time for all employers to have their favorite CDF Labor Law lawyer review employment arbitration agreements and update them to maximize future enforceability of such agreements.

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor in Chief

Sacramento Office Managing Partner and Chair of CDF’s Traditional Labor Law Practice Group. Mark has been practicing labor and employment law in California for thirty years. His practice has a special emphasis on the representation of California employers in union-management relations and handling federal and state court litigation and administrative matters triggered by all types of employment-related disputes. He is also adept at providing creative and practical legal advice to help minimize the risks inherent in employing workers in California. He recently named “Sacramento Lawyer of the Year” in Employment Law-Management for 2021 by Best Lawyers®.
> Full Bio   > Email   Call 916.361.0991

CDF Labor Law LLP © 2023

Editorial Board About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy