California Labor &
Employment Law Blog
BEWARE: New Requirements for How California Employers May Consider Criminal History In Employment Go Into Effect On October 1, 2023
Aug 9, 2023

BEWARE: New Requirements for How California Employers May Consider Criminal History In Employment Go Into Effect On October 1, 2023

Topics: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation, Employee Hiring, Discipline & Termination, New Laws & Legislation, Personnel Policies and Procedures

On October 1, 2023, changes to the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) regulations that govern how employers can use information about criminal history in employment decisions go into effect, modifying California Code of Regulations Title 2, Section 11017.1. These revised regulations add to the already long list of procedures that must be followed when a California employer is going to use criminal history as a basis for rejecting an applicant or taking other adverse actions against an applicant or employee. It will be very easy for employers to slip up here if they are not careful.  

California employers should be aware of the key provisions of the regulations (some of which are new and will be effective October 1, and some of which are already applicable). Employers with employees in California should ensure that HR and recruiting personnel are properly trained on these procedures, which are highlighted here:

  • Employers and other covered entities (“employers” for ease of reference) are prohibited from inquiring into (including through job applications, background checks, or internet searches), considering, or disseminating information about an applicant’s criminal history until after the employer makes a conditional offer of employment. A law that requires an entity other than the employer (such as an occupational licensing board) to conduct a criminal background check does not exempt the employer from these regulations.
    • There are certain exceptions to this requirement, such as for positions with state or local agencies that are required by law to conduct a criminal history check, for positions with a criminal justice agency, for certain defined Farm Labor Contractors, and for positions where the employer is required by law to conduct criminal background searches or restrict employment based on criminal history or other specified laws.
  • These prohibitions apply to new applicants, existing employees who have applied for or indicated a specific desire to be considered for a different position, and existing employees subject to a review and consideration of criminal history because of a change in ownership, management, policy, or practice. An applicant is also an individual who can prove that he or she has been deterred from applying for a job by an employer's or other covered entity’s alleged discriminatory practice. An employer cannot evade this requirement by having the applicant start working before the post-conditional offer review of criminal history.
  • These prohibitions apply to direct and joint employers, entities that evaluate applicant criminal history information on behalf of an employer, anyone acting as an agent of an employer, a staffing agency, and any person/entity that selects, obtains, or provides workers (who perform work in the employer’s usual course of business) or maintains a pool or availability list of workers.
  • If an applicant voluntarily discloses information about their criminal history before a conditional offer, the employer cannot consider any information volunteered that is prohibited by the regulations until after it has decided whether to make a conditional employment offer.
  • An employer may require applicants to complete an IRS form 8850 or equivalent (forms used to see if potential employees are members of a targeted group for purposes of qualifying for work opportunity credits) before a conditional offer of employment is made, as long as the information from the form is used solely to apply for the Work Opportunity Tax Credit.
  • California employers remain strictly prohibited from considering certain types of criminal convictions at any time (arrest/detention not leading to conviction, referral/participation in a diversion program, dismissed/sealed/expunged/statutorily eradicated convictions, certain juvenile matters, non-felony marijuana convictions over two years old, etc.).
  • If an employer preliminarily decides to deny an applicant after the conditional offer based on the conviction history (in whole or part), the employer must first conduct an individualized assessment and make a “reasoned, evidence-based determination” of whether the conviction history has a “direct and adverse relationship with the specific duties of the job that justify” denying employment that is “job-related and consistent with business necessity.” The individualized assessment should include, at a minimum:
    • The nature and gravity of the offense or conduct (such as the specific conduct of the applicant, whether there was harm to property or people, the degree and/or permanence of the harm, the context of the offense, whether a disability (including drug addiction or mental impairment) contributed, whether certain traumas contributed, and age at time of conduct);
    • The time that has passed since the offense and/or completion of the sentence; and,
    • The nature of the job.
  • If the applicant submits evidence of rehabilitation or mitigating circumstances (before or after the individualized assessment), the employer must consider that evidence.  
  • If, after the individualized assessment, the employer makes a preliminary decision to revoke the conditional offer, the employer must notify the applicant in writing of the preliminary decision. The notice must include all of the following:
    • Notice of the conviction(s) that were the basis for the preliminary decision;
    • A copy of the information used/relied on for the decision (defined broadly including reports and news articles); 
    • Notice that the applicant or someone acting on the applicant’s behalf has the right (but is not required) to respond before the decision becomes final, including to challenge the accuracy of the information and/or to submit evidence of rehabilitation and/or mitigating circumstances; and
    • Notice of the deadline to respond (no less than 5 business days after receipt of the notice, and e-mail notice is considered received two business days after it is sent). 
    • If the applicant timely notifies the employer in writing that additional time is needed to respond, the applicant must be given at least five additional business days to respond to the notice before the employer’s preliminary decision becomes final.
  • The employer must notify the applicant of any final decision to rescind the offer in writing and must include information regarding available procedures to challenge the decision and the right to contest the decision by filing a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department.
  • Even if the employer shows that its policy or practice of considering conviction history is job-related and consistent with business necessity, adversely impacted persons may still try to allege a violation of FEHA by claiming that there is a less discriminatory policy or practice that serves the employer’s goals as effectively as the challenged policy or practice without significantly increasing the cost or burden on the employer.

California employers are subject to these and many additional requirements when considering the criminal history of applicants and employees that may not be required in other jurisdictions. Contact your favorite CDF attorney for additional guidance on this issue.

About CDF

For over 25 years, CDF has distinguished itself as one of the top employment, labor and immigration firms in California, representing employers in single-plaintiff and class action lawsuits and advising employers on related legal compliance and risk avoidance. We cover the state, with five locations from Sacramento to San Diego.

> visit primary site

About the Editor in Chief

Sacramento Office Managing Partner and Chair of CDF’s Traditional Labor Law Practice Group. Mark has been practicing labor and employment law in California for thirty years. His practice has a special emphasis on the representation of California employers in union-management relations and handling federal and state court litigation and administrative matters triggered by all types of employment-related disputes. He is also adept at providing creative and practical legal advice to help minimize the risks inherent in employing workers in California. He recently named “Sacramento Lawyer of the Year” in Employment Law-Management for 2021 by Best Lawyers®.
> Full Bio   > Email   Call 916.361.0991

CDF Labor Law LLP © 2024

Editorial Board About CDF What We Do Contact Us Attorney Advertising Disclaimer Privacy Policy Cookie Policy