California Supreme Court Grants Review For Two More Meal and Rest Break Cases
The California Supreme Court granted review of National Steel and Mills (see below). Click here or here to read prior posts regarding how California courts are ruling on the issue about whether Labor Code § 226.7 penalties for meal and rest break violations are subject to a three year or a one year statute of limitations.
NATIONAL STEEL & SHIPBUILDING v. S.C. (GODINEZ)
Case: S141278, Supreme Court of California
Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 2006-04-12
Event Description: Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1) - civil case
Notes:
Petition for review GRANTED. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., S140308 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court. Werdegar, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: George, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Chin, Moreno, and Corrigan, JJ.
MILLS v. S.C. (BED, BATH & BEYOND)
Case: S141711, Supreme Court of California
Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 2006-04-12
Event Description: Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1) - civil case
Notes:
Petition for review GRANTED. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., S140308 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court. Werdegar, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: George, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Chin, Moreno, and Corrigan, JJ.